Volume 1 Issue 7
July, 2001 | |
| Home Page and Index | |
|
Part 1. Samuel-II Gentry By Willard Gentry Abstract Introduction This article is the first of three parts which will review in detail all the available documentary evidence relating to Joseph, Samuel and Nicholas-II. Rather than treat these in chronological order of age it will be more convenient to review Samuel and Nicholas first. The extremely limited information concerning Joseph will then be supplemented with what little is known about Gentrys of early Hanover and Louisa Counties, Virginia who are "orphans" - not clearly identified in their relationship but almost certainly descendants of Joseph. The following then is a comprehensive review of all of the information that is known to this writer concerning Samuel, and a discussion of the arguments for the identification of his children. Because of the length of the material covered, the article has been split into two halves and is being published in two separate installments. Samuel-II Gentry Samuel's name is found in the St. Paul's vestry records for the first time in 1716(1a) at which time it appears he was living at the far western end of St. Paul's Parish in the vicinity of Stone Horse Creek. This was about 30 miles upstream from Totopotomoy Creek, as the crow flies, along the Pamunkey River, and probably half again that distance if traveling along the river. The 1716 reference for Samuel was one in which he was in charge of building a road. We can use this as a rough measure to estimate his age at the time--certainly he would be over twenty-one, and probably several years older than that in order to have this responsibility. This would place the latest year for his birth as 1695. We know that his sister Elizabeth was christened in 1689, and that their parents did not appear to have a large number of closely-spaced children. An approximate year of birth in 1692 seems reasonable for Samuel. Based on the limited information available, we can infer some of the details of Samuel's life from the time he left his father's home along Totopotomoy Creek until he moved away from Dirty Swamp in Louisa County. Samuel must have moved initially about 1713, probably shortly after marrying, wanting to establish a new home for his family. He was undoubtedly attracted by the availability of new land at the far end of the parish along Stone Horse Creek, which was essentially the limit of settlement at that time, The road from Stone Horse Creek to Stony Run to which reference is made in the parish records was presumably a new land route from the west end of the parish which would link up with established roads in lower St. Paul's Parish, and minimize the need for river travel from one end of the parish to the other. This is probably the same road mentioned in 1756 as one boundary of the precinct in which Samuel (and then later Nicholas-II) was located in 1716(1g). What may be the same road, exists to this day as a country road that passes the upper ends of Stone Horse Creek and Beech Creek and then crosses Stony Run.
![]() Figure 1. Hanover and Louisa Counties, 1742 Samuel's brother, Nicholas-II, also left his father's home and came to the Stone Horse Creek precinct to join Samuel sometime between 1716 and 1719 (when the latter's name is first mentioned in the parish records), at which time Nicholas would have been between 19 and 22 years old. Nicholas may have lived first with his brother, but by 1719 he apparently was living on land of his own, and had presumably married. Whereas Nicholas remained in that same precinct for some 15 or more years, Samuel obtained new land not far away in 1723 and 1724(2a,b). Since he was not included in the processioning report for the original precinct when next it was filed in 1731, Samuel presumably either sold his first land, or he may have turned it over to Nicholas. (Recall that colonial grant documents have been preserved for Hanover County, but subsequent county deeds for the sale or purchase of those land have all been lost.) The succeeding processioning reports which continued at intervals until 1743(1b-f) show Nicholas and Samuel living in separate precincts. This reflected Samuel's presence on his land along Beech Creek (the land he owned on the north side of the South Anna River was a part of St. Martin's Parish and thus would not be included in St. Paul's Parish records). A collateral piece of evidence shows the presence of a Gentry, undoubtedly Samuel, living on the east side of Beech Creek in 1734(2c). One further reference to Samuel in Hanover County was in 1733 when he and his brother Nicholas served as surety for Mary Spradling who was appointed executor of the estate of her husband John Spradling(3). This has been interpreted as suggesting that Mary was a sister of Samuel and Nicholas, born perhaps in the interval between the two. In 1742, Samuel was granted land upriver along the South Anna River along a creek by the name of Dirty Swamp in an area that became Louisa County(2d). Samuel would necessarily have moved to his new property in order to consummate the grant by working the land. This was some 30 miles or so farther upstream along the South Anna River from where he previously lived. Louisa County was a brand-new county at that time, having been split off from Hanover County in 1742. Samuel's grant adjoined his brother Nicholas who had preceded him to Dirty Swamp in 1736. A portion of this land, Samuel obtained from Richard Brooks Jr., the father-in-law of Samuel's sons David and Nicholas. The remainder was new land, never before granted. A series of six deeds relating to the eventual disposition of this land are recorded in Samuel's name in Louisa County deed books during the period from 1747 to 1762(5). At the end of this time he had sold or given away all of his Louisa County land and had moved to Lunenburg County, following his family (as well as the Brooks family) to fresh settlements along the Meherrin River. In addition to the deeds, the only other Louisa County references to Samuel are two in the records for Fredericksville Parish, the new parish to which he had moved(4). Samuel moved to Lunenburg County between 1753 (when he sold land to John Gilbert while still in Louisa County) and 1755 (when as a resident of Lunenburg County he served as an appraisor of Richard Brooks' estate in that county(6a). Two deeds were recorded in Louisa County in 1757 and 1762 in which Samuel was identified as "of Lunenburg Co"(5e,g). No references to him are found in the records of Cumberland Parish, which served Lunenburg County. The only reference to Samuel in addition to these three that places him in Lunenburg County, is found in an order of the County Court in which a Joseph Gentry, orphan son of John Gentry, was bound to Samuel in 1761(6b) (see discussion below concerning Samuel's children). However, there are many references throughout the Lunenburg records to Samuel's children (and grandchildren) beginning in 1748 and continuing to 1772. The lack of any deed references to Samuel after 1762 is surely a case of Samuel (now in his mid-sixties) living during that time of his life with one of his children rather than on land of his own. Two references for a Samuel Gentry in Caswell County, North Carolina(7), suggest that Samuel spent the last years of his life with his son Allen, and died soon after 1779 in Caswell County, in an area that later became Person County. As for Samuel's wife, other than her name Ann, there is no information concerning her birth, her death, nor her family. Given the relatively large number of Allens among Samuel's descendants (beginning with one son and three grandsons), a name that is not found among the descendants of Samuel's two brothers, one can speculate that "Allen" came from Ann's family. Ann may have been a daughter of Richard Allen of Hanover County, and a sister or aunt of David Allen and William Allen whose names are found along with Gentrys in Lunenburg and Halifax County records in Virginia, and in Johnston County records in North Carolina. Samuel Gentry's Children
The older four sons, and daughter Ann, are probably correct in their order of birth, and their dates of birth are probably reasonably correct. Only four of Samuel's sons are mentioned in "Gentry Family in America", and he is not listed at all.
Ann Gentry
The Sons of Samuel Gentry Positive evidence for a relationship of individuals with Samuel and with each other include the following:
No one of these various types of evidence is conclusive in itself, but taken together, they can provide a strong argument for the proposed relationship. During the period of time Samuel was living in Louisa County, there were few occasions for documents relating him to his children. The gifts of land by Richard Brooks in 1743 to his two sons-in-law, David Gentry and Nicholas Gentry serve to identify their wives(11a)(16a), but by themselves do nothing to tie David and Nicholas to Samuel. When taken together with later documents concerning each of these two, however, the marriages are clearly tied to sons of Samuel and to the period when each was living in Louisa County. Similarly, when Nicholas and Mary sold their Louisa County land in 1757 and David Gentry and Allen Gentry served as witnesses, the relationship of these three can only be fully assessed in connection with later evidence. Greater importance can be placed on two occasions when deeds of sale by Samuel were witnessed by his sons, since in each instance, neither Samuel nor any of the sons (except possibly Richard) were living in Louisa County and the fact that the sons returned with Samuel to witness and participate in the land sale shows more than a casual relationship. In 1757, Samuel Gentry "of Lunenburg Co." signed a deed in Louisa County witnessed by David Gentry(5e), and in 1762, Samuel, again "of Lunenburg Co." signed a deed witnessed this time by Joseph Gentry, Richard Gentry, and Simon Gentry(5g). These instances of witnessing plus the fact that all of these individuals moved to Lunenburg County where Samuel eventually joined them, point strongly to the identification of seven of Samuel's children: David, Nicholas, Joseph, Allen, Simon, Richard and his daughter Ann. All of these are repeatedly documented in Lunenburg County records with joint deeds of sale, witnessing for each other, appearing in court as defendants or plaintiffs in joint suits, and living in adjacent areas. A number of these cases will be discussed below in brief individual summaries of each of Samuel's children. While Simon broke apart from the others and moved to Cumberland County, Virginia, of the children listed above Nicholas, Joseph, Richard, and two of Allen's children (Meshack and Abednego) went on from Lunenburg County to live in closely-neighboring locations in Surry County, North Carolina. Joining them in Surry County were William Gentry (who is referred to repeatedly in Lunenburg County records with the other Gentrys), and a younger Samuel Gentry. The latter is not included in any Lunenburg records, but there is some fragmentary evidence that he was living with his presumably older brother David both in Lunenburg County and also during a time when David was in Johnston County, North Carolina. Both Samuel Jr. and William then must be considered as candidates for children of Samuel Sr. Hezekiah Gentry also appears repeatedly in the Lunenburg County records, but there is strong evidence that he was a son of David, not of Samuel. After David's death, in 1766 David's widow Sarah moved with seven of her children, and with her brother Elisha Brooks and father Richard Brooks, to South Carolina, in an area that was later organized as Edgefield District. Hezekiah was not with the family at that time, but later came to join them, and spent the rest of his life with his siblings in South Carolina. Hezekiah was not listed as a tithable in David's household when the latter was included in tax lists in 1749, 1750, and 1752(12), hence we can conclude that he must have been less then sixteen in 1752. This is negative evidence, based on the lack of a record, and as such is recognized to be very dangerous. More positive evidence lies in the fact that Hezekiah bought and took title to land in 1757(13b) which would indicate he was at least twenty-one at the time. Both situations converge upon a single date of birth, 1736. We will now briefly summarize in turn, each of the Gentry sons we have identified above. Since this is an article concerning Samuel, and the relationship of his children to each other, there will be no attempt to discuss all of the documentation available for each, only so much as to outline their movements and their relationships to each other. To make the Lunenburg references more easily understandable, a little background information on that county will be helpful. Lunenburg County was formed in 1746 from Brunswick County, and many of the grants of
land there date from just a few years before that time. It was virgin territory at the time the
Gentrys moved there compared to the areas of central Virginia that had been settled in a
stepwise fashion, working upstream along the York and Pamunkey rivers. Lunenburg initially
encompassed ten counties that were eventually organized as separate entities, beginning with
a separation from Lunenburg County of an enlarged Halifax County in 1752. Lunenburg
attained its present size in 1764 when Mecklenburg County to the south, and Charlotte County
to the west, were separated from it. ![]() Figure 2. (left) Lunenburg County as first organized in 1746 and showing divisions of 1752 and 1764; (Right)A portion of Lunenburg County as of 1746 - 1764 showing land grants and watercourses Lunenburg County is shown in Figure 2 as it existed from 1746 to 1764, and shows the waterways named in various Gentry deed references. As a supplement to the various waterways, the approximate location of seven land grants are indicated on the map. These grants are mentioned a number of times in the text of deeds relating to the Gentrys, Samuel's son-in-law French Haggard, and the closely-related Brooks family. They help to a considerable extent in identifying the locations of various land transfers. It is interesting that all of Samuel's family moved into a small geographical area in Lunenburg County, and that every one of them had left within 25 years. The most obvious explanation is that the land had played out in that length of time, and was not worth staying in the neighborhood. The county today still has the forlorn appearance of an abandoned ghost county, the county courthouse in the town of Lunenburg (which is on the National Register of Historic Places) stands in lonely isolation in the midst of a small rural settlement. Perhaps one of the claims to fame for the courthouse is that it has not been burned or destroyed by passing army forces, thus leaving largely intact its store of county records. David Gentry The one documented reference to the composition of David's family establishes that his wife, Sarah, was a daughter of Richard Brooks of Louisa County. David's children (with whom we will not deal here for the most part) have been identified as such primarily based upon their appearance in South Carolina records where the family moved after David's death. We have already mentioned that David's father, Samuel, did not move from Hanover County to Louisa County until 1742 when he bought part of Richard Brooks' land on Dirty Swamp. David's in-laws lived in St. Paul's Parish also before they moved to Dirty Swamp in Fredericksville Parish in 1731. Although the two families were in different processioning precincts, they would have been close enough for David to become acquainted with Sarah Brooks before her family moved west. Considering the proposed date of marriage of David and Sarah, David must have left his own family home at an early age. Whether he followed the Brooks family to their new home on Dirty Swamp because of Sarah, or because of friendship with Sarah's brothers, we have no way of knowing. In any case, he must have married Sarah within two or three years after the Brooks family move. Why then, no mention of David in county records until he was given land by his father-in-law in 1743, and why the coincidence of two gifts to Gentry sons-in-law at the same time. The logical explanation is that after his marriage, David lived on a part of the Brooks homestead. Later, hen Nicholas Gentry and Mary Brooks married, it was an appropriate time for Richard Brooks to deed the land on which David was living to the latter, and to give a similar piece of land to his other son-in-law. David sold his Louisa County land in 1748(11b) to John Brooks (probably a brother of Sarah), and moved to Lunenburg County along with his Brooks in-laws. David is known to been in Lunenburg County at least as early as 1749, as shown by his presence in Lunenburg tax lists(12). His place of residence is not known during the time from 1749 until 1757 when he was first recorded as buying land in the county, a part of the Richard Taliaferro grant along Flat Rock Creek(13a). In 1757 and 1759, David was listed (along with his brother, Joseph) as a neighbor of Richard Brooks, occupying land at the north end of Reedy Creek. This last location was some distance to the west and north of Flat Rock Creek, and was presumably David's residence during his earlier years in Lunenburg County. Again, it appears logical that David had been invited by either his brother Joseph, or by Richard Brooks, to share their land (and presumably the labor of cultivating it). David sold his Flat Rock Creek land in October 1759(13c) and was identified at that time as being "of Johnson [Johnston] Co. NC", although he was in Lunenburg County Court in June of that year. Despite this identification, David continued to appear repeatedly in Lunenburg records: witnessing deeds (three of which were on behalf of Johnston County landowners), being named in Cumberland Parish processioning reports, and appearing in County Court minutes, the last being at the April 1765 Court(14). Whether David lived part time in both Lunenburg and Johnston Counties, or whether he returned to Lunenburg County full time, we do not know. (It is a curious fact that beginning in 1761, David was sued a number of times in court for the settlement of debts he incurred and he acknowledged them by default, not appearing to contest the suit. In each case, however, a summons was issued by the court to David, and he was never identified as no longer being a resident of Lunenburg County.) The 1765 court suit is the last known reference to David. The next reference to his family was in 1766, when Sarah Gentry was granted 450 acres of land in Edgefield District, South Carolina as a widow(15). We can assume, therefore, that David probably died in 1765. The acreage of land Sarah was allotted corresponds to 100 acres for herself and 50 acres apiece for seven children in her household. It has been mentioned above that Hezekiah was not with the family when it moved in 1766, but he did join them later and spent the rest of his life there. Was David a son of Samuel? The question of David's birth can be looked at in terms of two time constraints. The first is the last year Nicholas could have been his father, as compared with a reasonable period when Samuel could have been David's father. We have already estimated an approximate year, 1692, for Samuel's birth. The second constraint is for David to have married in time for David's son Hezekiah to be born at the appropriate time. If the earlier assumptions about Hezekiah are valid, this latter date we have estimated as 1736. The diagram below graphically illustrates the possibilities, using an approximation that the average age of marriage for men in Colonial Virginia ranged from say 18 to 24. Approximating further, this would translate to the age of a man at the time of the birth of his first child being roughly 19 to 25. ![]() Figure 3. Time Chart for Birth and Marriage of David Gentry We have arbitrarily divide the period equally between Samuel's birth and Hezekiah's birth in estimating dates for Samuel's marriage, and David's birth. There is indeed a reasonable time between Samuel's estimated birth for him to marry his wife Ann, for Ann to give birth to David, and for David's wife Sarah in turn to give birth to Hezekiah. It is also possible for David to have been a son of Nicholas, only in that case he would have been appreciably older than the average groom when he married. The records show that David's adult life in the years after his marriage was closely associated with Samuel's family. If indeed he was a son of Nicholas and a brother of Samuel, at what point did this close association with Samuel begin? Let us consider what might have happened if he was Nicholas' son. We know that Samuel left home before 1716 and settled upriver from his father's home on Totopotomoy Creek, presumably doing so not long after he married. In the years before Samuel married, David would have been raised by his mother if she was still alive, and if not, probably in the household of Samuel's older brother Joseph. He must eventually have moved from Totopotomoy Creek to join Samuel in upper St. Paul's Parish. This could have taken place at any time up to about 1730. After that it would have been very unlikely that he would have had any contacts that would have taken him to Dirty Swamp and his marriage with Sarah Brooks before either Samuel-II or Nicholas-II moved there. As for David's life in Louisa and Lunenburg County, he was involved as much in following his wife's family there as that of Samuel, and there is no difficulty in treating him either as a brother of Samuel or a son of Samuel. On balance, this writer is not comfortable with identifying David as a son of Nicholas. It makes more sense to treat him as a son of Samuel and I have done so in this document. Continuation
Notes Relating to Samuel Gentry
2. "Cavaliers and Pioneers, Abstracts of Virginia Land Patents and
Grants"
3. Rosalie Edith Davis, "Hanover County, Virginia, Court Records 1733 - 1735: Deeds, Wills and Inventories", 1733 Mar 1 p.8 4. "Gentry Family Gazette and Genealogy", published by Richard H. Gentry, McLean, VA, vol ii, #12, (Apr 1982), p.103-120, -- "The Gentry Family Working File", by Lee Corley Hendrix extracts entries for Fredericksville Parish [Louisa County]:
5. Louisa County Deed Book
6. Lunenburg County Order Book
7. W. P. Johnson, editor, "North Carolina Genealogy" ("Journal of North Carolina Genealogy" prior to 1967)
Selected Other References 8. Denis Hudgins, "Cavaliers and Pioneers, Abstracts
of Virginia Land Patents and Grants"
Ann Gentry Haggard
10. Lunenburg County Deed Book
David (and Hezekiah) Gentry
12. Landon C. Bell, "Sunlight on the Southside, Lists of Tithes, Lunenburg County, Virginia, 1748-1783", Genealogical Publishing Co., Baltimore, 1974. The entries for David include:
It is unfortunate that Landon Bell chose to publish only selected years of tithable lists in which there was any reference to Gentrys, namely the 1748-1751 records, 1752 when Halifax County was split from Lunenburg County, and 1764 when Mecklenburg and Charlotte were split from Lunenburg County. The intervening records tragically have been lost or misplaced. They would have revealed so much information about the younger members of the Samuel Gentry family as different ones moved to the county or reached tithable age. 13. Lunenburg County Deed Book
14.Lunenburg County Order Book 1765 Apr Court, Bk(11-7) 15. Brent H. Holcomb, "Petitions for Land from the South Carolina Council Journals, Vol VI, 1766-1770", SCMAR, Columbia, SC, 1999, p.39 "Meeting of Tuesday, 4 Nov 1766 [p.861-867]. The following Petitions Praying for Warrants of Survey, to Prolong Warrants and Certifying Platts were presented and read Viz:" |
|
© 2001, W.M. Gentry - All rights reserved. This article may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial purposes provided that proper attribution (including author and journal name) is included. |